A small revision of previous blog post.
The last thing I realized is that I have to take the Nibiru star’s varying speed into consideration. Nibiru moves faster when approaching our Sun; the general timeline will differ. This is particularly noticeable when Nibiru arrives from its longer orbit of 2783 years. The ”milestones” will appear faster in time, i.e., concerning the large Pole shift and the first transit of the star. Why didn’t I take this into consideration much sooner? A faint indication of this information is a star transit in 1600 BC, which very likely was recorded on the ”Nebra Sky Disk”.
But according to my calculations, there would have occurred a previous large Pole shift some years before, resulting in a massive tsunami event. Finding evidence for this, however, proves extremely difficult.
Though there really exist facts about an event around 1610 BC related to tsunamis. This has been ”pinned” to the Thera Santorini eruption, but can we establish the volcano to be the absolute cause? Just as strong evidence will put the Thera quake at 1628 BC. Was there then two eruptions? I find it quite possible that the 1610 BC event was due to an actual
Pole shift, causing a tsunami without any related volcano eruption.
Please note that the current model now proposes two shifts of Zodiac Precession’s per orbit!
Re-calculating the timeline
With the new considered data, the upcoming Pole shift will of course differ from what I stated before. What I now anticipate is a major Pole shift around the year 2052, which is much sooner than previous
assessments. Following this date is a star transit some ten years later, around 2062 AD. I must stress, though, that I am a layman in this field. The problem is that the powers that be blatantly refuses to hand out more proper
information. It would, of course, be much more convenient if space authorities boldly handed out correct data, in a form that people in common will comprehend.
This is the current predicted timeline:
