Elementary particles are far from
being clearly defined objects in an empty void. Vacuum in itself has a
structure, a geometry, even when matter, light and gravitation are absent.
Remaining is a dynamic "fabric of space" where matter and wave forms
can appear. As mentioned in the article on gravitation, small units that I call
"Nol and Nil", constitute the vacuum. Nol being the
"tangible" spherical objects and Nil being the unstructured void
between them. It's a strange concept, but Neither Nol, nor Nil has an
"image", this is evident since they form the vacuum where light
itself travels. Though unseen, Nol and Nil constitute the very foundation of
all that manifests.
The image to the
right shows a simplified image of vacuum, shown in just two dimensions. In
three dimensions the pattern is called "Hexagonal Close Packing",
only with spaces between the Nol units. In the ideal state of "vacuum at
rest", five Nol packed in together can theoretically fit between two
present Nol. This ideal state is key in understanding the concept of
'electrical fields'.
|
|
The seven field dimensions
At this point, I have to make a small digression: The Universe is a vast place with lot of different qualities. Regarding vacuum, there are in fact seven independent vacuum fields. These have always been there, ever present, constituting different realities concerning "density". Nol does not merely exist by themselves, they are also lumped together in three dimensional spheres, which in turn create the next vacuum dimension. And larger spheres in this dimension then form the third vacuum dimension, and so on, up to the seventh vacuum field, which is spiritual in nature. The lower vacuum fields will manifest "dense matter" whereas higher fields will manifest more subtle, transparent matter. In this narrative, I will henceforth center on one of these dimensions, the one we inhabit.
Electric fields
Of course, the
vacuum of space is seldom at rest, where stillness exist, movement must also
be present. Under the influence of energy, the Nol units are at times displaced. In the image to the
right, we see an area where Nol is in excess compared to the neutral vacuum
field. Alongside it we also see an area of Nil in excess. Field units of Nol
existing in the free I call 'Nolites', free field units of Nil I call
'Nilites'.
|
|
The shown image is however not a
true representation of areas in excess. This is because the dynamic vacuum will
immediately try to correct and balance a disturbance. Thus, the area of Nolites
will attempt to "push out" the surrounding vacuum to establish the
ideal state of vacuum at rest. This will only have partial success, and the
result is an electric field where one draws nearer to the ideal state, the
further away from the area of Nolites you get. In the same way, but opposite,
an area of Nilites will attempt to "pull in" the surrounding vacuum,
to establish equilibrium. This time another electric field is created, only it
has an opposite charge. Which state is associated with which charge? There is
no way of knowing, thus I propose a definition: A state of Nolites in excess is
defined as a positive charge, a state of Nilites in excess is defined as a
negative charge.
The double nature of light
Light can be described as a
transverse wave form in vacuum, but it is equally considered a particle. How can
that be, wherein lies the enigma that has never really been solved?
The simplified illustration above of
a light wave can be read as a sequence in time; from left to right or from
right to left. The light particle (the photon) has here been "frozen"
regularly in its path. The negative (white) pole consists of vacuum where
Nilites is in a state of excess, compared to neutral vacuum. The positive
(black) pole consequently has Nolites in a state of excess. These poles are not
stationary, they are drawn toward each other electrically while growing and
declining in a way that a oscillation (light wave) is created. The white and
black poles illustrates the electrical aspect of the light wave. When the poles
reaches zero, the movement is ended but immediately continues in a reversed
mode. Compared to the surrounding area at large, the poles neutralize each
other and the light wave are therefore neutrally charged.
The reason why the opposite poles
don't engulf each other and disappear lies in another aspect of the light wave
called "spin". In this model, spin could be seen as a vortex where
the Nol and Nil of vacuum spins in the vicinity of light and matter. The
movement of Nil in a specific photon moves in one direction, the movement of
Nil always move in the opposite direction.
The spin of the light wave is
situated at a 90 degree angle to the electric plane of the light wave. In the
image above we see the light wave "top down". When the electric poles
reaches minimum, the spin will appear to change direction, but what really
happens is that the electric poles will switch, and so the spin always continue
in the same direction, although waxing and waning between maximum and minimum.
The speed of Nil and Nol are fastest in the center of the photon, diminishing
outwards. It is therefore appropriate to speak of the photon as also having a
"spin field".
Particles
in motion, carrying a spin momentum, will create a electric dipole field in
itself. This is significant regarding the force called magnetism. In the part
"Wave properties of the electron", I will elaborate on this in more
detail.
The critical level of the light wave
The photon has a critical level, a
threshold energy. This is the point (at 1.02 MeV) where the photon has
accumulated so much energy that the waveform gets instable. When this happens,
the positive and the negative electrical poles of the photon will actually
split apart and go in different directions.
The image to the
right shows this division, where the photon breaks apart, creating (in this
case) an electron with negative charge and a "positron" with
positive charge. Again, you can't tell which particle carry which charge so I
simply make the definition the electron consists of an excess of Nilites. The
positron of course has opposite properties.
|
|
Neutrinos
So what are the tiny particles shown
between the electron and the positron? These are pairs of neutrinos, created as
an effect of the "division energy". In total, two neutrinos and two
anti-neutrinos. They are of course created out of the vacuum and the reason
there are two pairs is that the energy has to be equally distributed in three
dimensions; the electron and the positron in plane A, a neutrino and its
counterpart in plane B, a third neutrino pair in plane C.
I contend the neutrino do have mass
(though small) and that it therefore is quite able of residing in a state of
rest. The neutrino and its antiparticle will appear as tiny copies of the
electron e- and the positron e+. Since the neutrino (Ve) and the antineutrino
(anti-Ve) have mass, they also, per definition, have a charge. Small mass, weak
charge! Yes, I will argue that the neutrino and the antineutrino are in fact
the carriers of the 'weak force' of nature.
The photon is considered having a
spin value of 1. But in the division process, this value was inherited by the
electron/positron-pair with half of the spin value distributed to each
particle. In particle physics, the electron and the positron are bestowed the
spin value of ½ each. The same goes for the neutrino and its antiparticle,
which both have a spin value of ½. Particles with the same type of mass and an
equal spin value are reluctant to reside in the same place, they fiercely repel
each other, but I will try to show how the electron solves this problem by
keeping their neutrinos on different "energy levels".
The naked electron
In the image to the
right, we see the single, or the 'naked' electron, titled "ne". The
arrow determine the direction of its spin. Flanked on two sides, but on
different energy levels, two neutrinos (Ve) hold ground, both with opposite
spin. These neutrinos never leave the naked electron. If one would be pushed
out, a new neutrino pair are created out of vacuum; the neutrino stays and
the antineutrino is ejected. On the surface of the naked electron, we also
see a cloud of free nolites, attracted to the negative charge of the
electron. Please note that this is a scaled down model. The real distances
between the particles of this 'system' would in fact be tremendous.
|
|
The permanent neutrinos of the
electron can be defined as having a 'fixed rotation'. This meaning the three
particles of the system always form a straight line, because of the electrical
repulsion between the neutrinos. We are not talking 'string theory' here, but
the thought inevitably enters the mind since semi-stable elementary particles
actually (according to myself) use this structure. One would think the
neutrinos should be drawn into the electron but this does not occur. The reason
is the spin direction of the two neutrinos; equal spin will cause an repelling
force. The laws of particles on energy levels reads as; "only one particle with spin may reside on a specific
level on a given point in time". Two particles with equal spin on the
same level makes the system decay.
In this study, we have focused on
the electron only. The antiparticle (the positron) of course works in the same
manner but is positively charged and surrounded by two antineutrinos. The thin
'shell' of nolites on the surface of the electron are to be considered real
particles. They have left their places in the neutral vacuum and now roam free,
this until they "fall into" a nilite hole and once again are
incorporated in the vacuum field. The subtle shells of nolites and nilites form
the substance we know as "etheric matter". This is the essence of
what is called 'homeopathy', a medical profession that rightly should regain
some kind of legitimate status in society. Just because we can't measure it
does not mean it is none existing.
Vacuum geometry
Why does the electron have the very
specific mass of 0.511 MeV? When the pair conversion of the electron and
positron exceeds the 1,02 MeV limit with some amount, the particles doesn't
come out larger, they just end up with more kinetic energy. I believe this is a
quantified effect of certain by nature preferable patterns in vacuum; Nolites
and Nilites creating three dimensional structures. Spherical forms with great
harmonic shape is thus preferred by nature, and if an electron should be
damaged by, let's say, a free Nolite, then the electron immediately repairs
itself by creating a neutrino/antineutrino pair from vacuum. This ability by
vacuum of encouraging certain symmetrical shapes I call "vacuum
geometry". In later presentations, I will attempt to show how the electron divides into quarks, and
that even these quarks will follow the vacuum geometry standard.
Wave properties of the electron
An electron moving in vacuum does
not contain the same Nilite units it had when it was created. The movement per
se happens as the electron 'draws in' and relocates Nol from vacuum in the
direction of travel. This occurs simultaneously as it drops Nol hind ward.
Another way of putting it is that the electron creates Nilites in the direction
of travel and annihilate Nilites hind wards. The point being that the electron
behaves as a 'wave' rather than as a solid sphere. The electron and the
positron both move in vacuum without loss of energy, i.e. vacuum does not have
a 'syrup' like structure.
The image to the
right illustrates an electron moving from left to right. Since the electron
has spin, a meeting Nil unit in vacuum (A) will travel backwards in a curved
path to end up at the new location (B).
|
|
The curved paths of Nol passed by an
electron creates a disturbance in vacuum. Depending on the direction of spin, a
positive and a negative field will be created in the vicinity of the electron. Where
the curved path compresses vacuum, there is a positive field. Where the curved
path 'dilutes' vacuum, there is a negative field. This effect happens only with
electrons in motion, the spin dislocates vacuum to form what we are familiar
with as an electromagnetic current.
The excited state of the electron
Even the physic classes of Public
School (or corresponding) taught us that high energy light particles may
energize an electron and have it jump to a higher energy level (in the atom).
When jumping back, the electron emits a photon equivalent to the energy loss.
But where or how was the energy stored when the electron was in its excited
state? We may understand this using a model where a single photon can attach
itself to the electron, forming something we may call "bound light".
In the image to the
right, we see a single photon whose wave pattern form an elliptic orbit
around an electron, marked as a white dot. In order for the light wave to
stay put, the photon continually has to turn the positive field in towards
the electron. This would normally be a problem since the polarity of the
photon wave fields constantly changes direction.
|
|
The bound photon of an excited
electron solves this by turning the light wave 180 degrees at the 'trough' (th)
of the photon; the lowest point of the wave pattern. I will contend that all
matter, in various degrees, carries bound light which can be described as the
"light body" of entities.
The path of an electron around an
atom nucleus is an elliptic one. When at the closest point to the heavier
nucleus, the electron will shift its orbit a tiny degree, changing the existing
direction. Because of this, the electron will move in rosette-like patterns
around the atom. The common electron moves fast and close to the nucleus. But
with a photon bound to itself, the electron becomes heavier and slower in
motion. The electron cannot keep its previous orbit with preserved stability.
Thus it has to move out in a larger ellipse going further away from the
nucleus. When the photon eventually is ejected, the electron will return to its
original orbit.
Epilogue
There is a model describing the transformation
of light waves into gravity waves (and the other way around). All this probably
belongs to the science of elementary particles; their creation, structure and decay.
But this is for another chapter, another day!