The Light Wave and the Electron

Elementary particles are far from being clearly defined objects in an empty void. Vacuum in itself has a structure, a geometry, even when matter, light and gravitation are absent. Remaining is a dynamic "fabric of space" where matter and wave forms can appear. As mentioned in the article on gravitation, small units that I call "Nol and Nil", constitute the vacuum. Nol being the "tangible" spherical objects and Nil being the unstructured void between them. It's a strange concept, but Neither Nol, nor Nil has an "image", this is evident since they form the vacuum where light itself travels. Though unseen, Nol and Nil constitute the very foundation of all that manifests.

The image to the right shows a simplified image of vacuum, shown in just two dimensions. In three dimensions the pattern is called "Hexagonal Close Packing", only with spaces between the Nol units. In the ideal state of "vacuum at rest", five Nol packed in together can theoretically fit between two present Nol. This ideal state is key in understanding the concept of 'electrical fields'.

The seven field dimensions

At this point, I have to make a small digression: The Universe is a vast place with lot of different qualities. Regarding vacuum, there are in fact seven independent vacuum fields. These have always been there, ever present, constituting different realities concerning "density". Nol does not merely exist by themselves, they are also lumped together in three dimensional spheres, which in turn create the next vacuum dimension. And larger spheres in this dimension then form the third vacuum dimension, and so on, up to the seventh vacuum field, which is spiritual in nature. The lower vacuum fields will manifest "dense matter" whereas higher fields will manifest more subtle, transparent matter. In this narrative, I will henceforth center on one of these dimensions, the one we inhabit.

 Electric fields

Of course, the vacuum of space is seldom at rest, where stillness exist, movement must also be present. Under the influence of energy, the Nol units are  at times displaced. In the image to the right, we see an area where Nol is in excess compared to the neutral vacuum field. Alongside it we also see an area of Nil in excess. Field units of Nol existing in the free I call 'Nolites', free field units of Nil I call 'Nilites'.

The shown image is however not a true representation of areas in excess. This is because the dynamic vacuum will immediately try to correct and balance a disturbance. Thus, the area of Nolites will attempt to "push out" the surrounding vacuum to establish the ideal state of vacuum at rest. This will only have partial success, and the result is an electric field where one draws nearer to the ideal state, the further away from the area of Nolites you get. In the same way, but opposite, an area of Nilites will attempt to "pull in" the surrounding vacuum, to establish equilibrium. This time another electric field is created, only it has an opposite charge. Which state is associated with which charge? There is no way of knowing, thus I propose a definition: A state of Nolites in excess is defined as a positive charge, a state of Nilites in excess is defined as a negative charge.

The double nature of light

Light can be described as a transverse wave form in vacuum, but it is equally considered a particle. How can that be, wherein lies the enigma that has never really been solved?

The simplified illustration above of a light wave can be read as a sequence in time; from left to right or from right to left. The light particle (the photon) has here been "frozen" regularly in its path. The negative (white) pole consists of vacuum where Nilites is in a state of excess, compared to neutral vacuum. The positive (black) pole consequently has Nolites in a state of excess. These poles are not stationary, they are drawn toward each other electrically while growing and declining in a way that a oscillation (light wave) is created. The white and black poles illustrates the electrical aspect of the light wave. When the poles reaches zero, the movement is ended but immediately continues in a reversed mode. Compared to the surrounding area at large, the poles neutralize each other and the light wave are therefore neutrally charged.

The reason why the opposite poles don't engulf each other and disappear lies in another aspect of the light wave called "spin". In this model, spin could be seen as a vortex where the Nol and Nil of vacuum spins in the vicinity of light and matter. The movement of Nil in a specific photon moves in one direction, the movement of Nil always move in the opposite direction.

The spin of the light wave is situated at a 90 degree angle to the electric plane of the light wave. In the image above we see the light wave "top down". When the electric poles reaches minimum, the spin will appear to change direction, but what really happens is that the electric poles will switch, and so the spin always continue in the same direction, although waxing and waning between maximum and minimum. The speed of Nil and Nol are fastest in the center of the photon, diminishing outwards. It is therefore appropriate to speak of the photon as also having a "spin field".

Particles in motion, carrying a spin momentum, will create a electric dipole field in itself. This is significant regarding the force called magnetism. In the part "Wave properties of the electron", I will elaborate on this in more detail.

The critical level of the light wave

The photon has a critical level, a threshold energy. This is the point (at 1.02 MeV) where the photon has accumulated so much energy that the waveform gets instable. When this happens, the positive and the negative electrical poles of the photon will actually split apart and go in different directions.

The image to the right shows this division, where the photon breaks apart, creating (in this case) an electron with negative charge and a "positron" with positive charge. Again, you can't tell which particle carry which charge so I simply make the definition the electron consists of an excess of Nilites. The positron of course has opposite properties.

Neutrinos

So what are the tiny particles shown between the electron and the positron? These are pairs of neutrinos, created as an effect of the "division energy". In total, two neutrinos and two anti-neutrinos. They are of course created out of the vacuum and the reason there are two pairs is that the energy has to be equally distributed in three dimensions; the electron and the positron in plane A, a neutrino and its counterpart in plane B, a third neutrino pair in plane C.

I contend the neutrino do have mass (though small) and that it therefore is quite able of residing in a state of rest. The neutrino and its antiparticle will appear as tiny copies of the electron e- and the positron e+. Since the neutrino (Ve) and the antineutrino (anti-Ve) have mass, they also, per definition, have a charge. Small mass, weak charge! Yes, I will argue that the neutrino and the antineutrino are in fact the carriers of the 'weak force' of nature.

The photon is considered having a spin value of 1. But in the division process, this value was inherited by the electron/positron-pair with half of the spin value distributed to each particle. In particle physics, the electron and the positron are bestowed the spin value of ½ each. The same goes for the neutrino and its antiparticle, which both have a spin value of ½. Particles with the same type of mass and an equal spin value are reluctant to reside in the same place, they fiercely repel each other, but I will try to show how the electron solves this problem by keeping their neutrinos on different "energy levels".

The naked electron

In the image to the right, we see the single, or the 'naked' electron, titled "ne". The arrow determine the direction of its spin. Flanked on two sides, but on different energy levels, two neutrinos (Ve) hold ground, both with opposite spin. These neutrinos never leave the naked electron. If one would be pushed out, a new neutrino pair are created out of vacuum; the neutrino stays and the antineutrino is ejected. On the surface of the naked electron, we also see a cloud of free nolites, attracted to the negative charge of the electron. Please note that this is a scaled down model. The real distances between the particles of this 'system' would in fact be tremendous.

The permanent neutrinos of the electron can be defined as having a 'fixed rotation'. This meaning the three particles of the system always form a straight line, because of the electrical repulsion between the neutrinos. We are not talking 'string theory' here, but the thought inevitably enters the mind since semi-stable elementary particles actually (according to myself) use this structure. One would think the neutrinos should be drawn into the electron but this does not occur. The reason is the spin direction of the two neutrinos; equal spin will cause an repelling force. The laws of particles on energy levels reads as; "only one particle with spin may reside on a specific level on a given point in time". Two particles with equal spin on the same level makes the system decay.

In this study, we have focused on the electron only. The antiparticle (the positron) of course works in the same manner but is positively charged and surrounded by two antineutrinos. The thin 'shell' of nolites on the surface of the electron are to be considered real particles. They have left their places in the neutral vacuum and now roam free, this until they "fall into" a nilite hole and once again are incorporated in the vacuum field. The subtle shells of nolites and nilites form the substance we know as "etheric matter". This is the essence of what is called 'homeopathy', a medical profession that rightly should regain some kind of legitimate status in society. Just because we can't measure it does not mean it is none existing.

Vacuum geometry

Why does the electron have the very specific mass of 0.511 MeV? When the pair conversion of the electron and positron exceeds the 1,02 MeV limit with some amount, the particles doesn't come out larger, they just end up with more kinetic energy. I believe this is a quantified effect of certain by nature preferable patterns in vacuum; Nolites and Nilites creating three dimensional structures. Spherical forms with great harmonic shape is thus preferred by nature, and if an electron should be damaged by, let's say, a free Nolite, then the electron immediately repairs itself by creating a neutrino/antineutrino pair from vacuum. This ability by vacuum of encouraging certain symmetrical shapes I call "vacuum geometry". In later presentations, I will attempt to show  how the electron divides into quarks, and that even these quarks will follow the vacuum geometry standard.

Wave properties of the electron

An electron moving in vacuum does not contain the same Nilite units it had when it was created. The movement per se happens as the electron 'draws in' and relocates Nol from vacuum in the direction of travel. This occurs simultaneously as it drops Nol hind ward. Another way of putting it is that the electron creates Nilites in the direction of travel and annihilate Nilites hind wards. The point being that the electron behaves as a 'wave' rather than as a solid sphere. The electron and the positron both move in vacuum without loss of energy, i.e. vacuum does not have a 'syrup' like structure.

The image to the right illustrates an electron moving from left to right. Since the electron has spin, a meeting Nil unit in vacuum (A) will travel backwards in a curved path to end up at the new location (B).

The curved paths of Nol passed by an electron creates a disturbance in vacuum. Depending on the direction of spin, a positive and a negative field will be created in the vicinity of the electron. Where the curved path compresses vacuum, there is a positive field. Where the curved path 'dilutes' vacuum, there is a negative field. This effect happens only with electrons in motion, the spin dislocates vacuum to form what we are familiar with as an electromagnetic current.

The excited state of the electron

Even the physic classes of Public School (or corresponding) taught us that high energy light particles may energize an electron and have it jump to a higher energy level (in the atom). When jumping back, the electron emits a photon equivalent to the energy loss. But where or how was the energy stored when the electron was in its excited state? We may understand this using a model where a single photon can attach itself to the electron, forming something we may call "bound light".

In the image to the right, we see a single photon whose wave pattern form an elliptic orbit around an electron, marked as a white dot. In order for the light wave to stay put, the photon continually has to turn the positive field in towards the electron. This would normally be a problem since the polarity of the photon wave fields constantly changes direction.

The bound photon of an excited electron solves this by turning the light wave 180 degrees at the 'trough' (th) of the photon; the lowest point of the wave pattern. I will contend that all matter, in various degrees, carries bound light which can be described as the "light body" of entities.

The path of an electron around an atom nucleus is an elliptic one. When at the closest point to the heavier nucleus, the electron will shift its orbit a tiny degree, changing the existing direction. Because of this, the electron will move in rosette-like patterns around the atom. The common electron moves fast and close to the nucleus. But with a photon bound to itself, the electron becomes heavier and slower in motion. The electron cannot keep its previous orbit with preserved stability. Thus it has to move out in a larger ellipse going further away from the nucleus. When the photon eventually is ejected, the electron will return to its original orbit.

Epilogue

There is a model describing the transformation of light waves into gravity waves (and the other way around). All this probably belongs to the science of elementary particles; their creation, structure and decay. But this is for another chapter, another day!

Gravitation and the Soul

It all starts with the vacuum of space, the Ether, which Einstein disproved but which undoubtedly is a reality. The number one consequence of the Ether is that the Universe is infinite in time and space. According to myself, vacuum itself is filled with undividable units, placed at certain distances from each other. I call these units 'Nol', the "holes" between Nol I call 'Nil'.

In the theoretical state where vacuum is at rest, one Nol will reside at a distance of six times the distance of neighboring Nol. When one Nol counts as one, then "the seventh step is the return", thus the number seven is integrated with the number one (base-6). This creates a vacuum geometry which resembles "Hexagonal Close Packing" (only not close packed).

Neither Nol, nore Nil are particles, they just constitute the fabric of vacuum. Nol and Nil were never created, they have always been present and always will. But the Universe must always be in a state of equilibrium, in total. Therefore there must be an equal amount of 'disturbance' in vacuum, this is what we call motion, or energy.  Energy will take several forms, but the main ones are the transverse waveform and the longitudinal waveform. The transverse waveform will appear as light (the details is another chapter). The longitudinal waveform in vacuum will appear as gravitational waves.

Forget the standard concept of gravitational waves from exploding stars. What I suggest is that gravitational waves  (G-waves) are ever present. They flow (like the force in Star Wars) back and forth and matter is sort of semi-transparent to these waves. Some waves goes right through matter such as particles, planets and stars, some waves reflect back to form an 'interference pattern' at the outer limit of the object at hand. One mind-boggling aspect of G-waves is that their speed in vacuum by far exceed the speed of light, a natural aspect of the longitudinal waveform!

So what is gravitation? Look at it like this: A body (A) in space is receiving G-waves from all directions, reflecting some and letting others through. This creates an interference zone of 'standing waves' around the body, a gravitational field. Now let's place another body (B) at a stationary distance from the body A.

What happens now is that both bodies will experience a decrease in waves in the direction of the other body. To compensate this unbalance, the bodies will start to accelerate in the direction of each other, in other words; they are falling. They will continually fall in the direction of one another unless there is a common orbit pattern keeping them in a precise motion around each other, creating a balancing centrifugal force.

Now to the fascinating part; we can more or less prove the existence of these faster than light waves! We only have to look at the interference patterns appearing at the edges of surfaces, at pinpoint holes or narrow slits. This effect is known from the "Camera Obscura" phenomenon where a small hole in a box acts as a lens, creating an upside down image inside the box. The standard interpretation is that this is a consequence of the nature of light waves. I dare to think otherwise, I am convinced light bends in the distorted space created by interfering (standing) gravity waves. One must remember that even particles acts as waves when conducting the classical "double slit experiment". The conclusion must be that light (or particles) only images a pattern already existing!

The Soul

Does G-waves originate from any specific place in space and time? Yes, and it appears that gravity waves in fact are a conscious energy. This flow of energy is what has always been known in many cultures as 'Chi, Ki, Prana, Ruach, Pneuma' etc. This energy emanates from the Soul nucleus of every entity of the Universe, and is also absorbed in the same manner. This is the tool the Soul uses to extract information from the senses of the present physical (or spiritual body).

The body is not conscious in itself, the body is merely a vehicle by which the Soul can have an experience in the actual dimension. When it comes to the human being, the process of the Soul entering the body is as follows: When the Soul nucleus enters the human, it connects itself to the "landing place"; the pineal gland. Then the nucleus starts emitting G-waves. A gravitational "bubble" starts to appear and this bubble will grow to encompass the hole body. But in order to do so, the nucleus has to adjust and descend down the spine of the body, finally resting at the "dwelling place" of the Soul; the solar plexus, the sphere of the Soul thus being fully developed.

Technically speaking, the outer limit of the Soul sphere is in the area where the frequency of the outgoing waves can no longer be distinguished from the general wave frequency from the Universe at large. At an 'out-of-body-experience', the Soul will take the same way out as it came in. The Soul sphere will start to diminish and the Soul nucleus ascends up the spine to the pineal gland, where it can detach itself from the body. This sometimes is an extremely fast process. The person in question can actually "see" this process as a journey through "a dark tunnel", as many "Soul Travelers" has testified.

To complicate matters a bit; I contend G-waves exist in seven different frequency dimensions concerning size. These are: The particle dimension, the cell dimension, the human dimension, the planet/solar dimension, the galaxy dimension, the galaxy-cluster dimension and a seventh spiritual dimension. The interference pattern of G-waves is discernible only in our human dimension, this is because light reveals their presence. In smaller and larger dimension we see no interference pattern only because the wavelength of light does not compare in size with the local G-waves at hand. Still, we must assume G-wave interference patterns actually exist, around small particles as well as at the surface of stars and galaxies.

A new view on galaxies

Based on the ether model of the Universe, there are two kinds of hydrogen available. Either we have a positive nucleus surrounded by a negatively charged particle, or we have a negative nucleus (an antiproton) surrounded by a positively charged particle (a positron). The proton is always created in pair with the antiproton. We know about the common element of hydrogen; where in the Universe do we find anti hydrogen?

Atomic matter

To make it perfectly clear what kind of matter we are talking about, we need to make a definition of the matter in question. In this case, relating to matter at the atomic level; protons and neutrons, surrounded by the lighter 'leptons' (electrons and positrons). In this study, we will disregard even the neutrons, concentrating on the element of hydrogen in its simplest form.

AM1 = Atomic matter type 1. Positive nuclei (protons) surrounded by negative satellite particles (electrons). AM2 = Atomic matter type 2. Negative nuclei (antiprotons) surrounded by positive satellite particles (positrons).

A stable environment

In order for interstellar matter to be able to agglomerate and form larger objects such as planets, suns and galaxies, the condensing gas cloud must consist of the same type of atomic matter. If AM1 and AM2 would meet within the same area, they would continually annihilate each other, never forming larger quantities of stable matter. The waste product in the reaction of matter and anti matter immediately forms new matter, but the atomic structure is not regenerated; matter will remain in its plasma state (free nuclei and free leptons). These 'plasma clouds' are always precursors in the creation process of stable atomic matter.

Thus, the plasma cloud must initially divide itself into two different areas, where each area consist of only one type of atomic matter. We have already reached the conclusion our solar system are composed of one and the same type of atomic matter. By definition, we consider the proton to have a positive charge and the electron to have a negative charge. However, you cannot by observation only, determine the type of matter of which for example a star consist of. Even gravity will react in the same manner vis-à-vis the two types of atomic matter.

Cosmic melting pot

So if specific areas exist where plasma gets divided into atomic gas clouds; should we not be able to identify these areas? The answer is: We can and we do, but we are so familiar with the structures that we pay no particular attention to them, we don't interpret them correctly. The division of AM1 and AM2 does not happen at the solar level, it happens at the galactic level! Consequently, we have to go back to the Galaxy morphological classification of Edwin Hubble.

The structures interesting in this context are the 'barred galaxies' and in some aspect the galaxies classified as 'Theta'. What we are looking for is a structure with a central core, surrounded by two external dense areas. What is crucial in this stage is whether the central plasma core has a rotation or not. The most common condition seem to be a core contracting while rotating, other alternatives are mostly exceptions.

 Galactic pair conversion

Let's start with viewing a rotating plasma core just starting to create atomic matter in two areas on each side of the central core. This type of galaxy are defined as 'SBa' in the Hubble classification system. The central core is still pronounced and from both areas of atomic matter a spiral arm is generated, consisting of newly created stars by condensation of gas.

 In the following state, the central core has diminished (see previous image) This structure is called 'SBb'. Finally (depending on mass and rotation) the central core tends to fade away totally and we will have two completely separate galaxies.

Provided the initial rotation of the central core was strong enough, the two areas of different atomic mass will separate from each other. They have now developed into two individual galaxies. They are 'sibling galaxies' but will consist of totally different types of matter. Both will generally stay in the primal galaxy cluster.

Non rotating systems

When there is a central core with no rotation, a different structure will appear. There is a galactic core as before but the atomic matter created will form into two spherical areas opposite each other. The result is a galaxy type SB0. In this case, it is the outward directed force of the core reactions only that resist the contracting gravity force.

The central core will continue to diminish, simultaneously as the two spherical areas will continue to grow. This type of galaxy are called 'Theta', after the Greek letter Ɵ. The crucial aspect of whether the two areas will be able to separate permanently are the total mass of the system. A great gas pressure in the core reaction may achieve this.

 It is somewhat uncertain exactly how galaxies from a non rotating core will manifest. They will probably not create elliptical galaxies, which likely are the end results of spiral galaxies having lost their rotation and the distinctive shape of their spiral arms. One may assume non rotating plasma cores to end up as irregular galaxies, with no pronounced structure.

Galactic interference

Galaxies with different consisting matter will by no means explode when "colliding". Galaxies mostly consist of empty space and it is still the gravitational forces governing these processes. The solar wind of stars (primarily consisting of protons) also creates a repulsing force of the galaxy stars, counteracting collision with other heavenly bodies. You can never rule out galaxies 'adopting' parts of other galaxies, even those with differing type of matter. A newly created galaxy will however always be constituted of the same type of matter AM1 or AM2.

Rotation of stars within galaxies

 A spiral galaxy is a giant vortex. Single stars will move in rosette-like elliptical orbits. Thus a star will move in close to the galactic core and proceed out towards the edge of the galaxy. At the core position, the angle will shift by a small degree so that the ellipse in itself will move itself gradually around the galaxy core. Following the laws of Kepler, the velocity of the star will be at its highest close to the galaxy core, slowing down at the edge position. This movement of a star around the 'mother galaxy' will of course take thousands of years to accomplish (but who is in a hurry).